The flaws — player laziness, player errors, lack of a clinical pass or finish in the final third — were there, should never be ignored nor underestimated. But nor should they erase the improvement. Watching the match I was sure of it, watching it for the second time it was still clearer and the stats support the argument.

– Stream on ESPN+: LaLiga, Bundesliga, MLS, more (U.S.)

Barcelona were on the ball nearly 10 full minutes more than Madrid and used that to make more than twice the number of passes in their attacking third (147) than Los Blancos (73). In other words it wasn’t sterile, “shuffling the ball about” possession … there was threat.

Barcelona had 18 efforts at goal, more of which (5) were on target than Madrid. The losing team had more passing accuracy, ran further, won the ball back more often in total than their rivals, and also won the ball back in under five seconds far more than Madrid.

Hold on, just in case you’ve lost the thread, this is for the hard of memory, the hard of understanding and the die-hard Madridistas who think that because I’m arguing about the quality of Barcelona’s play in defeat that somehow implies something detrimental about the Spanish and European champions. It doesn’t.

Once more for the record: Carlo Ancelotti’s Madrid team had a game plan, executed it very well, produced superb power plays when it counted, are currently much more street smart than their Clasico rivals and, crucially, made far fewer errors. The better team won.

But, in recent weeks, there’s been jubilation about things like Barcelona moving back to the top of LaLiga for the first time in a couple of years, about the “value” of winning (against Mallorca and Celta) while playing poorly, and that jubilation was used to ignore the truth that the Blaugrana have often looked ordinary, lacking in cohesion and should have conceded more often.

Against Madrid, Barca did things like reducing Vinicius Jr. to only 20 involvements in the match — normally he’s on the ball 52 times per LaLiga game this season. In all, 79% of the champions’ possession was in their own half, they were slower in high intensity sprints than Barcelona and made dramatically fewer of them too.

play

Steve McManaman and Ian Darke discuss Barcelona and Real Madrid’s performances in El Clasico.

All of which means it’s time to restate why Barcelona lost.

They lost because they are less mentally intense than Madrid right now, because they make far more critical mistakes than Los Blancos, because there is an enormous gulf in the “all-for-one-and-one-for all” spirit of a team which, largely, has been together for several years and won repeat Champions Leagues compared to a team (squad) which is younger, smaller and has been together for less time. Furthermore, Barca are in the midst of being coaxed back into life by a coach in the first elite position of his life and who has been in charge (of a crisis club) for less than a year.

Some examples: Madrid’s first two goals were created by players who were literally falling over. Toni Kroos not only resisted being fouled by Sergio Busquets when Madrid took the lead — his desire to triumph helped him get off a superb pass which bisected the defence. Then, 23 minutes later, Dani Carvajal was given a very slack pass from Karim Benzema, which was going out of play, when he lunged at the ball and smashed it up towards Vinicius for Madrid’s second goal.

The beautiful game lives here. Stream top leagues, tournaments and teams.
Sign up for ESPN+

TUESDAY, OCT. 18
• RB Leipzig vs. Hamburg (12 p.m. ET)
• Kickers vs. Frankfurt (12 p.m. ET)
• Sevilla vs. Valencia (1 p.m. ET)
• Getafe vs. Athletic Club (2 p.m. ET)
• Darmstadt vs. Gladbach (2:45 p.m. ET)
• Hoffenheim vs. Schalke (2:45 p.m. ET)
• Braunschweig vs. Wolfsburg (2:45 p.m. ET)
• Atletico Madrid vs. Rayo (3 p.m. ET)

And there’s where we put flesh on the bones. Vinicius had almost a third fewer touches on the ball than normal and, if one only looked at the stats without live action to compare, it would be easy to say, “bad day at the office.”

Yet the Brazilian, again, was absolutely central for Madrid’s first two goals. He is not given very much but turns that into match-winning contributions. It’s precisely the talent which, compared to Barcelona winger Ousmane Dembele, I identified in last week’s column as likely to be decisive. As such, Vinicius was a microcosm of the Madrid performance — he drew the absolute maximum from the key moments in the game.

Then there are Barcelona’s mistakes. Sometimes teams are superseded because of the excellence of rivals. Barcelona, this season, continue to commit glaring error after glaring error — either defensively or (less often) offensively. And, having looked woeful (“chaotic” according to Busquets) when Inter Milan scored three times at Camp Nou last midweek, Barcelona repeated the trait at the Bernabeu.

Take the first goal. As the move began, it was Vinicius who headed the ball down to Kroos and then took up a left midfield position. At that moment, Raphinha, who would have been told about 40 times that starting against Madrid means helping Sergi Roberto contain Vinicius, was smack-bang next to his brilliant Brazil teammate.

It’s not as if Raphinha, even in his debut LaLiga season, doesn’t know what Vinicius is capable of, or what needs to be done to patrol him properly. Nor was it only club points, or his starting place in Xavi’s team, at stake. The World Cup is imminent, Brazil expect to win, and coach Tite will have been watching.

As Vinicius began to trot, Raphinha stood still. As Vinicius broke into a sprint, Raphinha was an interested spectator — a fan could have handed him a box of popcorn and said: “Hey, look mate, isn’t that your man who’s racing past Sergi Roberto?”

For the second goal, it was Frenkie de Jong’s unwillingness or inability to run with Aurelien Tchouameni, matched with the inability or unwillingness of Pedri and Dembele to press Federico Valverde, who was in splendid isolation to net a stunning strike to put Los Blancos 2-0 up. One big error after the other.

Then De Jong mindlessly gifting possession straight to Ferland Mendy at the inception of Madrid’s third goal, and Eric Garcia’s naive and bizarre decision to lunge at Rodrygo for Madrid’s penalty rather than jockey him into a less dangerous area given that Barcelona had six men covering the three opponents in that attack. All of these mini-catastrophes of mentality, or character, or athleticism, condemned the visitors to a merited defeat.

Nevertheless, the fact that Barcelona were still in the match and looking threatening before they made it 2-1, that Ansu Fati nearly made it 2-2, the huge variety of stats listed above, plus the return of Kounde and obvious truth that Ronald Araujo makes a massive difference to the team’s defensive security, all suggest that Sunday was a setback and will only become a disaster if the players don’t stop making horrible errors.

At this stage last season, under Ronald Koeman, Barcelona were sixth, had lost more games, won fewer, scored fewer and conceded more. Xavi said “the process is taking longer than I want” after losing to Inter last week, but at least the process looked clearer at the Bernabeu.

There remains one hard, unavoidable truth: before the month ends in 14 days’ time, Barcelona have to face, and stay unbeaten against, Villarreal, Athletic Club, Bayern Munich (all at home), then Valencia away.

It’s a breathtaking, breathless sequence which, if it ends negatively, will inevitably mean a rush to judge in a resultadista fashion which obscures any, perhaps all, positive things which Barça’s under-pressure, frustrated and somewhat beleaguered coach has achieved ahead of next month’s one year anniversary in the job.